🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."